1. U.S. Department of Energy; Office of Environmental Management. Closing the circle on the splitting of the atom: The environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production in the United States and what the Department of Energy is doing about it. January 1995. Report no. DOE/EM-0266.

2. Groves LM. Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project. New York: Da Capo, 1962.

3. Smyth HD. Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945.

4. Robinson GO. The Oak Ridge Story: The Saga of a People Who Share in History. Kingsport, TN: Southern Publishers, 1950.

5. O’Neill K. Building the bomb. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons since 1940. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998:33–104.

6. Dean G. Report on the Atom: What You Should Know about the Atomic Energy Program of the United States. New York: Knopf, 1953.

7. Makhijani A, Schwartz SI, Weida WJ. Nuclear waste management and environmental remediation. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons since 1940. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998:353–94.

8. Norris RS, Kosiak SM, Schwartz SI. Deploying the bomb. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons since 1940. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998:105–96.

9. U.S. Department of Energy, Highly Enriched Uranium Working Group. Environmental, safety, and health vulnerabilities associated with the department’s storage of highly enriched uranium; December 1996. Report no. DOE/EH-0525.

10. U.S. Department of Energy, Plutonium Working Group. Environmental, safety, and health vulnerabilities associated with the department’s plutonium storage; November 1994. Report no. DOE/EH-0415.

11. Hacker BC. The Dragon’s Tail: Radiation Safety in the Manhattan Project, 1942–1946. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987.

12. Franklin JC (Manager, Oak Ridge Operations) to Wilson CL (General Manager, Washington). Subject: Medical Policy. September 26, 1947. Available at: http://www.defendingscience.org/upload/Franklin_1947.pdf. Accessed in December 2007.

13. ChemRisk, Inc. Task 2 Report- Mercury Releases from Lithium Enrichment at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant- A Reconstruction of Historical Releases and Off-Site Doses and Health Risks. Submitted to the Tennessee Department of Health. July 1999.

14. National Research Council. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

15. Magnuson E. They lied to us: Unsafe, aging U.S. weapons plants are stirring fear and disillusion. Time. October 31, 1988:60–65.

16. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program. Overview of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program. Fall 2001.

17. Anigstein R, Thurber WC, Mauro JJ et al. (S. Cohen and Associates, under contract no. 1W-2603-LTNX with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air). Technical support document: Potential recycling of scrap metal from nuclear facilities. Part 1: Radiological assessment of exposed individuals. Vol. 1, 2001. Chapter 4: Quantities and characteristics of potential sources of scrap metal from DOE facilities and commercial nuclear power plants. Available at:  http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/docs/source-management/tsd/scrap_tsd_041802_ch4.pdf Accessed in February 2008.

18. U.S. Department of Energy Top-to-Bottom Review Team. Review of the Environmental Management Program. February 4, 2002.

19. Memorandum from Wilson CE (chief, Insurance Branch, AEC) to Vallado AC (deputy declassification officer, Declassification Branch, AEC). Re: Review of document by Knowlton. December 20, 1948. Available at http://www.defendingscience.org/upload/Wilson_1948.pdf. Accessed in December 2007.

20. Michaels D. In memorium: Thomas F. Mancuso, MD, MPH (1912–2004). Am J Ind Med. 2005;47(1):1–3.

21. Mancuso TF, Stewart AM, Kneale GW. Radiation exposures of Hanford workers dying from cancer and other causes. Health Physics. 1977;33:369–85.

22. Kneale GW, Mancuso TF, Stewart AM. Hanford radiation study 3: A cohort study of the cancer risks from radiation to workers at Hanford (1944–1977 deaths) by the method of regression models in life-table. Br J Ind Med. 1981;38:156–66.

23. Kneale GW, Mancuso TF, Stewart AM. Identification of occupational mortality risks for Hanford workers. Br J Ind Med. 1984;41:6–8.

24. Kneale GW, Mancuso TF, Stewart AM. Job-related mortality risks of Hanford workers and their relation to cancer effects of measured doses of external radiation. Br J Ind Med. 1984;41:9–14.

25. President’s Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Chapter 10: Atomic veterans: Human experimentation in connection with atomic bomb tests. The Human Radiation Experiments: The Final Report of the President’s Advisory Committee. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

26. Radiation-exposed Veterans Compensation Act. Public law no. 100–321, May 20, 1988.

27. Orphan Drug Act. Public law no. 97–414, January 4, 1983.

28. Report of the National Institutes of Health ad hoc Working Group to Develop Radioepidemiology Tables. 1985.

29. Eisenbud M. An Environmental Odyssey: People, Pollution, and Politics in the Life of a Practical Scientist. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.

30. Ball H. Justice Downwind: America’s Atomic Testing Program in the 1950s. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

31. Udall SL. The Myths of August. New York: Pantheon, 1994.

32. Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). Public law no. 101–426, October 15, 1990.

33. Parascandola M. Uncertain science and a failure of trust: The NIH radioepidemiologic tables and compensation for radiation-induced cancer. Isis. 2002;93:559–84.

34. Janofsky M. 111 uranium miners left waiting as payments for exposure lapse. New York Times. March 27, 2001:A1.

35. Michaels D (assistant secretary for Environment Safety and Health, Department of Energy). Memorandum to Minsk R (National Economic Council). Subject: Work products from interagency working groups. March 31, 2000.

36. Warrick J. Paducah workers sue firms; class action cites radiation exposure, seeks $10 billion. Washington Post. September 4, 1999:A1.

37. Warrick J. Administration sides with workers in uranium factory suit. Washington Post. May 31, 2003:A2.

38. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, Safety, and Health. Phase 2 independent investigation of the Paducah gaseous diffusion plant: Environment, safety, and health practices, 1952–1990. February 2000.

39. Memorandum to the files of Dunham CL (director, Division of Biology and Medicine, AEC) and Bruner HD (chief, Medical Research Branch, Division of Biology and Medicine, AEC). Subject: Neptunium237 contamination problem, Paducah, Kentucky, February 4, 1960; filed March 11, 1960. Available at: http://www.defendingscience.org/upload/Paducah_1960.pdf. Accessed in December 2007.

40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment Safety and Health. Independent investigation of the Portsmouth gaseous diffusion plant. Vol. 1: Past environment, safety, and health practices. May 2000.

41. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, Safety, and Health. Independent investigation of the East Tennessee Technology Park. Vol. 1: Past environment, safety, and health practices. October 2000.

42. Transcript: U.S. Department of Energy public meeting with assistant secretary of Energy, Dr. David Michaels, for employees of the Portsmouth gaseous diffusion plant. Comfort Inn, Piketon, OH. October 31, 1999.

43. Transcript: U.S. Department of Energy public hearing—injured [Los Alamos National Laboratory] workers. Northern New Mexico Community College, Espanola, NM. March 18, 2000.

44. Transcript: U.S. Department of Energy public meeting: Workers’ Compensation initiative [for Pantex Plant employees]. Civic Center Grand Plaza, Amarillo, TX. June 29, 2000.

45. Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA). Public law no. 106–398, October 30, 2000.

46. Government Accountability Office. Department of Energy, Office of Worker Advocacy: Deficient controls led to millions of dollars in improper and questionable payments to contractors. May 2006. Report no. GAO-06-547.

47. Office of Sen. Grassley C (R-IA). Press release: Grassley urges Senate conferees to support changes to Energy Employee Occupational Illness Compensation Program. Issued September 14, 2004.

48. Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005: Part 4, Division C, Subtitle E: Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program. Public law no. 108–375, October 28, 2004.